PDA

View Full Version : You as a filmmaker; an Artist or Entertainer?


xsanmdanx
04-09-2009, 09:24 AM
As a filmmaker, are your films more art or are they entertainment? I think myself more as an entertainer than as artist, but I still like to go to the details. I'm like 75% entertainer and 25% artist.

How about you?

nooneimportant77
04-09-2009, 09:31 AM
Lots and lots of times I find myself saying 'Well... as long as it looks cool I don't really care'. Which I think lands me in entertainment, but lately I've been trying to find ways to be more expressive.

atomic9studios
04-09-2009, 09:39 AM
I believe im 60% entertainer and 40% Artist. I want to keep the audience focusing on the film's plot and backstory as much as possible. But at the same time, i also want it to look good to people who aren't concerned about the movie's plot, but its camera work and other itty bitty details.

Like noone said, Im an entertainer, but in the past few months, ive been trying to be more "fluent" in the art form of film :D

Griffmo
04-09-2009, 10:38 AM
I'm an entertainer with class. I want people to enjoy my stuff, but if it's not well done, and has some kind of meaning, it's not worth making too me. I hate snobby art films, they bore me, and seem to me just a way to show off your "superiority"

xsanmdanx
04-09-2009, 10:54 AM
I have a great DP, who is the artist in our group. But as a writer I still like to stick my finger on the artistic sides also. I've been lately interested in prop-making, but I don't think that as a aspect on filmmaking.

Blaman
04-09-2009, 11:07 AM
I like to think the two do not have to be separated. I think the entertainment comes from the artistry. My films may be art, but they are not experimental. That stuff drives me mad sometimes

bubblefax
04-09-2009, 11:23 AM
25 percent artist 40 percent entertainer and 50 percent film maker.

Yeah I went past 100 what you gonna do about it... Tee Hee

atomic9studios
04-09-2009, 01:44 PM
WHAT AM I GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?!

Im gonna go geocaching, thats what im gonna do about it :D

Todd
04-09-2009, 04:06 PM
when i was studying Game Development/Engineering in school, we always brought up the art vs entertainment argument.

ART > ENTERTAINMENT.

Indymoguler
04-09-2009, 05:16 PM
entertainer. although im more interested in artistic parts of the film, society is more drawn to entertainment than anything else nowadays.

Nonsensical studios
04-09-2009, 05:33 PM
I make films to tell a story. If you find them entertaining, then that's just a plus.

Citrus
04-09-2009, 05:41 PM
I make films to tell a story. If you find them entertaining, then that's just a plus.
This.

Ladri.
04-09-2009, 06:10 PM
I make films to tell a story. If you find them entertaining, then that's just a plus.

Nonsensical knows his shit.

Nonsensical studios
04-09-2009, 06:16 PM
Nonsensical knows his shit.

:D

insane12
04-09-2009, 07:44 PM
i see my self as 70% artist 30% entertainer. Although my short films never made it to the finish product, they are probably more original then what you see most out of Hollywood.

Fisherking
04-09-2009, 09:35 PM
1% artist, 1% entertainer, 100% wanker.

WesScog
04-09-2009, 09:41 PM
But that's 102%.

Steelersk36
04-09-2009, 10:01 PM
I would have to say I'm an entertainer.
No shame attached whatsoever.
Yes, I like to put my art into my films, but entertainment is
completely necessary. Not much good to express your art
if no one is there to watch it.

Fisherking
04-09-2009, 10:09 PM
But that's 102%.

I always go one better.

trspballer7
04-09-2009, 10:10 PM
I would rather call myself an artist than an entertainer, so I put more artistic measurements into my films.

WesScog
04-09-2009, 10:21 PM
I always go one better.

But, isn't that two better?

nolan
04-09-2009, 10:22 PM
I make films to tell a story. If you find them entertaining, then that's just a plus.

I think thats a main goal for a lot of filmmakers, but then you can express yourself through art all you want but if it's not entertaining you will be the only one watching the film to get your message.so to a point a goal must be to make it entertaining enough for an audience to watch so that your message/story can get through.so I see it as a compromise between the filmmaker and his art and the audience and their entertainment

Fisherking
04-09-2009, 10:24 PM
But, isn't that two better?

I also go one better than one.

Indymoguler
04-09-2009, 10:27 PM
ah but i go 103%

stikyfingas
04-09-2009, 10:29 PM
I'd call myself neither, I'm a amateur.

WesScog
04-09-2009, 10:31 PM
I also go one better than one.

Touche.

Brainstrained
04-10-2009, 12:27 AM
Good art is entertaining, good entertainment is art.

thorni52
04-10-2009, 01:16 AM
I have yet to make a film that expresses true meaning. So I guess I would fall under the entertainer category. I do concentrate on the look of my films a lot though.

loosechange
04-10-2009, 02:18 AM
artist.

filmmaking is a craft.

GhostOfAllie
04-12-2009, 01:21 AM
Good art is entertaining, good entertainment is art.

This says it all.